feat(axum): add interaction registry alias
Add an interactions()/on() registration path and move canonical examples off explicit register_handle naming while keeping low-level registry types available underneath. req: axum_integration/003 req: ceremony/001 req: dx/003 req: examples/003
This commit is contained in:
+1
-1
@@ -441,7 +441,7 @@ what a valid business email is.
|
||||
002 Existing Axum routes remain normal Axum routes. slhx does not own routing. slhx-axum only mounts handler dispatch, runtime assets, and optional push endpoints.
|
||||
|
||||
### req: axum/003
|
||||
003 Interactive fragments that would traditionally be implemented as `/demo/...` HTMX endpoints should be expressible as `#[slhx::handler]` functions returning generated slot commands.
|
||||
003 Interactive fragments that would traditionally be implemented as `/demo/...` HTMX endpoints should be expressible as `#[slhx::handler]` functions returning generated slot commands. Integration registration should read as interactions over generated handles, not low-level registry wiring.
|
||||
|
||||
### req: axum/004
|
||||
004 Query-string demo endpoints may be migrated to typed handler params from `data-*` attributes or forms. `Query<T>` remains available in normal Axum routes but is not the slhx happy path.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user